Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Journal of Urology ; 209(6):1216-1218, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20240536
2.
Vestnik Urologii/Urology Herald ; 11(1):125-133, 2023.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2323729

ABSTRACT

Male reproductive health depends on many factors, including whether infectious diseases occur in the reproductive system. Such changes may be reflected in the semen analysis. In the past three years, the number of individuals who fell ill with COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 has been growing worldwide, including in Russia. This infection causes dysfunction and a negative effect on many organs and systems, including reproductive organs, which is reflected in abnormal semen parameters. Despite the high efficacy and small number of side effects found in clinical trials, only 56% of the population in the US and 49% in the Russian Federation reported wanting the vaccine. One of the reasons for distrust of vaccines is the potential negative impact on fertility. A literature review is devoted to the study of the effect of SARS-CoV-2 and vaccination on male reproductive health. The search was carried out using Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE databases.Copyright © 2023 Authors. All rights reserved.

3.
Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction ; 12(2):58-63, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2325320

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine affects sperm morphokinetics using a computer-assisted semen analyzer and other semen parameters using a sperm chromatin structure assay. Method(s): Healthy male volunteers in two Japanese clinics between May 2021 and December 2021 were prospectively analyzed. Participants donated sperm twice, two days apart, in the following phases: before vaccination, 2 weeks after the first vaccine dose, and 2, 4, and 12 weeks after the second dose. Basic sperm parameters, sperm motility characteristics, and the percentage of DNA-damaged sperm were compared among the different phases. Result(s): Ninety-six semen samples from ten volunteers, who were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, were evaluated. There were no significant differences between any phases in basic semen findings and parameters of the sperm chromatin structure assays. Regarding sperm motion characteristics, the average linear velocity, beat-cross frequency, and sperm motility index significantly decreased after the second vaccine dose (P=0.018, P=0.003, and P=0.027, respectively), with no significant differences between any two phases by post-hoc pairwise comparisons. Conclusion(s): After COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, while sperm motion characteristics might fluctuate, no apparent deterioration of basic sperm parameters or sperm DNA integrity was observed. Given the adverse effects of COVID-19 on sperm, our findings suggest that there might be no reason to refrain from vaccination for healthy individuals.Copyright © 2023 Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction Produced by Wolters Kluwer- Medknow.

4.
Vestnik Urologii/Urology Herald ; 11(1):125-133, 2023.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2315540

ABSTRACT

Male reproductive health depends on many factors, including whether infectious diseases occur in the reproductive system. Such changes may be reflected in the semen analysis. In the past three years, the number of individuals who fell ill with COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 has been growing worldwide, including in Russia. This infection causes dysfunction and a negative effect on many organs and systems, including reproductive organs, which is reflected in abnormal semen parameters. Despite the high efficacy and small number of side effects found in clinical trials, only 56% of the population in the US and 49% in the Russian Federation reported wanting the vaccine. One of the reasons for distrust of vaccines is the potential negative impact on fertility. A literature review is devoted to the study of the effect of SARS-CoV-2 and vaccination on male reproductive health. The search was carried out using Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE databases.Copyright © 2023 Authors. All rights reserved.

5.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 40(7): 1623-1629, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298654

ABSTRACT

The rapid outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought challenges to different medical fields, especially reproductive health. To date, most studies on the effects of COVID-19 on male reproduction have some limitations. In addition, there is little research on the mechanisms underlying by which severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection affects semen quality. Here, we revealed the possible impact of COVID-19 on sperm parameters and the potential mechanisms. At present, it is still controversial whether COVID-19-induced fever adversely affects sperm parameters. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 can induce up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine, which leads to the destruction of blood-testis barrier and impairment of spermatogenesis. Moreover, severe viral infection of the respiratory system could induce systemic oxidative stress. Sperm are highly vulnerable to it due to their limited levels of antioxidant defense, unsophisticated DNA damage detection and repair mechanisms. Our review prompt medical staff and patients to consciously check the reproductive function of COVID-19 male patients. Moreover, opening our prospective beyond the direct infection could be the key to better understand the COVID-19 short and long-term effects and provide a new idea for future treatment of patients with reproductive function injury.

6.
Transl Androl Urol ; 12(3): 353-363, 2023 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2297216

ABSTRACT

Background: Although the negative impact on fertility of men recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been suggested, there is insufficient evidence, and the data are limited and contradictory. The present prospective study aimed to evaluate the sex-related hormones, semen parameters, erectile dysfunction (ED), and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in a cohort of men who recovered from COVID-19 and age-matched control men. Methods: Semen samples were collected from twenty-two men recovered from COVID-19 with a median time of 91.5 days and thirty-six control males. The semen parameters were evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) laboratory manual to examine and process human semen. The blood samples were collected to assess the male hormone profile. ED and LUTS were evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), respectively. Results: The follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (3.819±1.515 IU/L), luteinizing hormone (LH) (4.023±1.792 IU/L), prolactin (PRL) [12.60 (10.72-15.20) ng/mL], and testosterone (T) [4.345 (3.565-5.525) ng/mL] levels were at normal range in all males enrolled in the study. Levels of semen volume (control: 2.5 mL vs. COVID-19: 1.9 mL; P<0.05) and sperm concentration (control: 59×106/mL vs. COVID-19: 41.5×106/mL; P<0.005) were significantly lower in males recovered from COVID-19, but still technically well within normal regardless of WHO edition. All variables were examined through logistic regression analysis, demonstrating that only sperm concentration was an independent variable associated with men recovered from COVID-19 [odds ratio (OR) =1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.999-1.098; P=0.016]. According to correlation analysis, there was no correlation between sperm concentration and other semen parameters and sex-related hormone profiles. Furthermore, an absence of ED and LUTS in men who recovered from COVID-19 was evidenced using the IIEF-5 and IPSS, respectively. Conclusions: Reproductive-age males recovered from COVID-19 have normal sperm concentration. Sperm concentration did not correlate with other semen parameters, sex-related hormones, IIEF-5, and IPSS. Further studies should be performed to evaluate whether the lower sperm concentration and semen volume that were still within the normal range are a transient or prolonged downregulation resulting from the COVID-19 attack.

7.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 39(7): 1555-1563, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287211

ABSTRACT

AIM: The rapid outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed challenges across different medical fields, especially reproductive health, and gave rise to concerns regarding the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on male infertility, owing to the fact that the male reproductive system indicated to be extremely vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Only a small number of studies have investigated the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on male reproduction, but the results are not consistent. So, we performed this meta-analysis to draw a clearer picture and evaluate the impacts of COVID-19 on male reproductive system. METHOD: We searched Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases to identify the potentially relevant studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied to assess the relationship. Heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias testing were also performed. RESULTS: A total of twelve studies including 7 case control investigations and 5 retrospective cohort studies were found relevant and chosen for our research. Our result showed that different sperm parameters including semen volume [SMD = - 0.27 (- 0.46, - 1.48) (p = 0.00)], sperm concentration [SMD = - 0.41 (- 0.67, - 0.15) (p = 0.002)], sperm count [SMD = - 0.30 (- 0.44, - 0.17) (p = 0.00)], sperm motility [SMD = - 0.66 (- 0.98, - 0.33) (p = 0.00)], and progressive motility [SMD = - 0.35 (- 0.61, - 0.08) (p = 0.01)] were negatively influenced by SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, sperm concentration (p = 0.07) and progressive motility (p = 0.61) were not found to be significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in case control studies. No publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION: The present study revealed the vulnerability of semen quality to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our data showed a strong association of different sperm parameters with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results suggested that SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients may negatively influence their fertility potential in a short-term period, but more studies are needed to decide about the long-term effects.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Semen , Semen Analysis , Sperm Count , Sperm Motility , Spermatozoa
8.
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences ; 27(1):378-383, 2023.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2238965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have shown that there may be a deterioration in sperm parameters in patients who had recovered from COVID-19 disease. We aimed to investigate the relationship between COVID-19 disease and semen parameters in idiopathic male infertility patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted among male patients who applied with infertility between June 2021 and February 2022 following the approval of the Ethics Committee. Idiopathic infertility patients who could give semen analysis were included in the study. Detailed medical history of all patients was obtained. The presence of detectable causes of infertility was defined as exclusion criteria. The patients who had COVID-19 disease history (Reverse Transcriptase-PCR or Computed Tomography findings) in the last year were divided into two groups COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-). The semen samples obtained from patients after a 3 day sexual abstinence in accordance with the WHO 2021 criteria were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 42 male idiopathic infertility patients who met the criteria were included in the study. It was analyzed that both groups were similar in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and habits (p> 0.05). It was determined that 40.4% (n=17) had COVID-19 disease. The mean duration time after COVID-19 was 9.6 (4-17) months. Mean sperm concentration was found to be statistically significantly lower than the COVID-19 (-) group (41.59 +/- 17.4 vs. 58.8 +/- 21.9;p=0.021). Semen volume (3.05 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.32 +/- 0.6 mL;p>0.05), progressive sperm motility (34.05 +/- 20.96 vs. 43.00 +/- 16.94;p=0.12) and normal sperm morphology (3.47 +/- 1.42 vs. 3.08 +/- 1.41;p=0.41) were similar in both groups. The mean sperm concentration of the patients who recovered in the last 6 months (25.37 +/- 9.07 vs. 56.03 +/- 29.67 million/ml;p=0.013) compared to patients with >6 months after recovery (n=9) was found to be significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 disease can cause a significant decrease in sperm concentration in idiopathic infertility patients, especially in the first 6 months, and the rates of oligospermia and asthenospermia are higher.

9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 2022 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231779

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 era, semen collection at infertility centers might increase the risk of spreading SARS-CoV-2. Seminal fluid collection at home is an alternative method for preventing this spread. However, there is no conclusion about the effect of home vs clinic semen collection on semen parameters and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. This systematic review and metaanalysis aimed to assess the effect of semen collection location on semen parameters and fertility outcomes. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using the major electronic databases including MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, OpenGrey, and CENTRAL from their inception to September 2021. CLINICALTRIALS: gov was searched to identify the ongoing registered clinical trials. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all human randomized controlled trials and observational studies that investigated the effect of at-home semen collection vs in-clinic semen collection on semen parameters and fertility outcomes. METHODS: We pooled the mean difference and risk ratio using Review Manager software version 5.4.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2022). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach was applied to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Seven studies (3018 semen samples) were included. Overall, at-home semen collection results made little to no difference in semen volume (mean difference, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.10 to 0.85; low-quality evidence), sperm count (mean difference, -6.02; 95% confidence interval, -27.26 to 15.22; very low-quality evidence), and sperm motility (mean difference, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, -4.39 to 5.92; very low-quality evidence) compared with in-clinic semen collection. There was no difference in fertilization rate (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.03; very low-quality evidence) and pregnancy rate in in vitro fertilization (risk ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.25; very low-quality evidence). CONCLUSION: At-home semen collection had no adverse effects on semen parameters or fertility outcomes compared with in-clinic collection. However, higher-quality evidence is needed.

10.
J Med Virol ; 2022 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2229560

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have revealed severe damage to male fertility from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, raising concerns about the potential adverse impact on reproductive function of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine developed based on the virus. Interestingly, there are several researchers who have studied the impact of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine since then but have come up with conflicting results. As a near-ideal candidate for mass immunization programs, inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has been widely used in many countries, particularly in less wealthy nations. However, little is known about its effect on male fertility. METHODS: Here, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single large center for reproductive medicine in China between December 2021 and August 2022. 519 fertile men with no history of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were included and categorized into four groups based on their vaccination status: unvaccinated group (n=168), one-dose vaccinated group (n=8), fully vaccinated group (n=183), and booster group (n=160). All of them underwent a semen analysis and most had serum sex hormone levels tested. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in all semen parameters and sex hormone levels between the unvaccinated group and either vaccinated group. To account for possible vaccination-to-test interval-specific changes, sub-analyses were performed for two interval groups: ≤90 and >90 days. As expected, most of the semen parameters and sex hormone levels remained unchanged between the control and vaccinated groups. However, participants in vaccinated group (≤90 days) have decreased total sperm motility and increased FSH level compared with the ones in unvaccinated group. Moreover, some trends similar to those found during COVID-19 infection and recovery were observed in our study. Fortunately, all values are within the normal range. In addition, vaccinated participants reported few adverse reactions. No special medical intervention was required, and no serious adverse reactions happened. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination does not impair male fertility, possibly due to the low frequency of adverse effects. This information reassures young male population who got this vaccine worldwide, and helps guide future vaccination efforts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

11.
Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis ; 71(4):447-451, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2201695

ABSTRACT

Objectives The corona virus SARS-COV-2 has affected millions of people all over the world with much affection and damage to body systems and organs, and still, its long-term effects are debatable. Up till now, a lot of ongoing researches are being conducted to evaluate the deleterious effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on various systems, including reproduction, however, it is still debatable. Patients and methods Our cohort study included a total of 57 male COVID-19 patients, confirmed positive via nasopharyngeal PCR swab. The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between the severity of COVID-19 infection and post-COVID sequelae on male-reproductive functions as regards semen parameters and male-hormone profile at the first and third month after discharge from the hospital. Results Our results have demonstrated highly statistically significant changes in sperm concentration, sperm total, and progressive motility, as well as follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and E2-hormone levels on the first and third month post-COVID infection with P value less than 0.001. In the same context, there was a statistical significance to testosterone-hormone level with P value 0.003. According to COVID-19 severity, there was a highly significant correlation between the degree of severity and affection of sperm concentration, total, and progressive motility with P value less than 0.001. In contrast, there was no significant correlation between the severity of infection and male-hormone profile. Conclusion The current study revealed a negative influence of COVID-19 infection on semen parameters as well as male-sex hormones (follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, testosterone, and E2) on the first and third month post-COVID infection;however, only semen parameters were affected by the degree of disease severity. Copyright © 2022 The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis.

12.
Arch Esp Urol ; 75(10): 831-843, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2207238

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epitomizes the best preventative SARS-CoV-2 infection strategy to counteract the severe consequences of infection. However, concerns have been raised that the vaccines could have an adverse effect on sperm function and overall reproductive health. This combined systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of different available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on semen parameters. METHODS: A systematic PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, LILACS (Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud), and Scilit database literature search until mid-June 2022 was conducted. Prospective and retrospective studies were eligible. No limitation was placed on language. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were thereafter obtained. RESULTS: Upon search completion, 122 studies were identified and retrieved and 110 were excluded, while the remaining 12 independent studies evaluating the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines on semen parameters were included in this review. The total number of men included was 1551, aged 22.4-48 years. Following meta-analysis, the SMD summary measure with 95% CI for each semen parameter included a concentration of 0.22 (0-0.22); Total sperm count of 0.11 (0.18-0.24); Total motility of 0.02 (0.05-0.09); Volume of 0.02 (-0.1-0.14); Vitality of 0.55 (-0.19-0.29), progressive motility of -0.43 (-0.54 to -0.32); Total motile sperm count of -0.38 (-0.44 to -0.31); And normal morphology of 0.42 (-0.54 to -0.3). In brief, the total sperm count was slightly increased post-vaccination, while progressive motility, total motile sperm count, and normal morphology were marginally reduced post-vaccination, according to the meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: No effects were observed regarding sperm viability and semen volume since the results of all the studies crossed the line of no effect. All seminal parameters analyzed showed a negligible or small change in relation to the vaccination effect. Furthermore, the parameters remained within the normal World Health Organization reference ranges, making the clinical significance unclear. Therefore, based on these results, it appears that vaccination does not have negative effects on semen quality. The individual study findings suggested that COVID-19 vaccines are not associated with decreased semen parameters.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Semen , Humans , Male , Semen Analysis/methods , COVID-19 Vaccines , Sperm Count , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Prog Urol ; 32(16): 1431-1439, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Impaired semen quality and reproductive hormone levels were observed in patients during and after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which raised concerns about negative effects on male fertility. Therefore, this study systematically reviews available data on semen parameters and sex hormones in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Systematic search was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar until July 18th, 2022. We identified relevant articles that discussed the effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on male fertility. RESULTS: A total number of 1,684 articles were identified by using a suitable keyword search strategy. After screening, 26 articles were considered eligible for inclusion in this study. These articles included a total of 1,960 controls and 2,106 patients. When all studies were considered, the results showed that the semen parameters and sex hormone levels of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 exhibited some significant differences compared with controls. Fortunately, these differences gradually disappear as patients recover from COVID-19. CONCLUSION: While present data show the negative effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on male fertility, this does not appear to be long-term. Semen quality and hormone levels will gradually increase to normal as patients recover.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Semen , Semen Analysis , Gonadal Steroid Hormones , Hormones
14.
Andrologia ; 54(11): e14574, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2019119

ABSTRACT

The emerging coronavirus illness (COVID-19) pandemic is posing a global health hazard, with men being at a larger risk than women. There have been few publications on the andrological consequences of COVID-19 and its vaccines so far. To assuage vaccine fear stemming from concerns about fertility, the effect of inactivated whole-virus and viral vector vaccines on semen quality was investigated in 100 Egyptian men. The safety of COVID-19 vaccines on semen parameters was validated with no significant change in pre- and post-vaccination semen analyses in either type of vaccine. Following COVID-19 vaccination, we can declare male semen parameters as unaffected.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Female , Male , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Semen , COVID-19/prevention & control , Semen Analysis , Vaccination/adverse effects , Fertility
15.
Human Reproduction ; 37:i232-i233, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2008571

ABSTRACT

Study question: Does a history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (CoronaVac) in males influence male fertility, gamete and embryo development, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes? Summary answer: CoronaVac vaccination in males may not have an adverse effect on patient's performance or the gamete and embryonic development potential during ART treatments. What is known already: Vaccines against COVID-19 have been approved for emergency use in several countries and regions, while concerns about the potential negative effect of vaccines on fertility contributed to vaccine hesitancy. It is urgent to explore the effect of CoronaVac on human fertility to help to overcome vaccine hesitancy about possible fertility impairment. Study design, size, duration: A retrospective cohort study enrolled couples undergoing IVF cycles between June and August 2021 at Reproductive Medicine Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. According to the history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in males, the participants were divided into the vaccination group and the non-vaccination group. Participants/materials, setting, methods: A self-controlled study of semen analyses for males before and after CoronaVac vaccination was conducted. Baseline characteristics were matched using propensity score matching. Participants were categorized into the unexposed group (non-vaccination) and exposed group (vaccination), and the population was 271 for each. Semen parameters and IVF outcomes were the main outcomes. Main results and the role of chance: Generally, no statistically significant differences were exhibited between the matched cohorts regarding embryo developmental parameters, including fertilization rate, cleavage rate, high-quality embryo rate, blastocyst formation rate, and available blastocyst rate, as well as clinical outcomes, such as implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. Moreover, males after vaccination seemed to have fluctuated semen parameters including increased semen volume, lower motility, and decreased normal forms of sperms, while the motile sperm counts were similar. In addition, all semen parameters were above the lower reference limits. Limitations, reasons for caution: It was a single-center retrospective cohort study with a small sample size, and the men enrolled were suffering from infertility, which limited the generalizability of the conclusions. In addition, the endpoint of the current is a confirmation of clinical pregnancy, a study with a longer period of follow-up was urgent. Wider implications of the findings: Our findings suggested that CoronaVac vaccinations in males may not have adverse effects on patient's performance or the gamete and embryonic development potential during ART treatments. Larger studies among a wider population with longer followup in the future are required to support and validate our observations.

16.
Health Sci Rep ; 5(5): e745, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1976718

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is known to affect multiple organs by binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors and might therefore affect male fertility. This review aims to collect all original articles on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on male fertility, including the duration of time after infection required for these effects to begin to manifest and recommend how clinicians should approach cases with a recent illness. Methods: This review was developed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The search string was applied to four online databases-namely Pubmed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane COVID-19 Register-and screened using the online tool Covidence.org. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were cohort studies involving a healthy male population diagnosed with COVID-19, each of whom had semen samples collected before and after the infection or two different semen samples collected after the diagnosis. Results: Nine cohort studies were eventually included. Five articles had pre- and post-COVID-19 data while four had two sets of post-COVID-19 data. The three largest studies found a statistically significant decrease in all semen parameters when waiting less than 3 months from diagnosis before sample collection, and no significant differences in results when the ejaculate was analyzed more than 3 months after recovery. One study compared the COVID-19 patients with a control group and found a significant decrease in semen parameters in the COVID-19 group. Conclusion: Spermatogenesis seems to be affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection, but the impact tends to reverse within 3-4 months. It is still unclear why male fertility is affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection, and it might be the result of several different components. Clinicians should consider recent SARS-CoV-2 infection as a possible reason for the low semen quality of patients' semen samples, and might therefore need to collect new samples after 4 months before further treatment.

17.
Journal of Urology ; 207(SUPPL 5):e358, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1886496

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Current evidence has proven the systemic nature of COVID19, including its involvement in the male reproductive tract. We aimed to investigate seminal parameters of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 men during the convalescence phase. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 18 to 50-yearold men with confirmed moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Patients were enrolled 15 to 45 days after the diagnosis. After a urologist's initial clinical evaluation, semen samples were obtained by masturbation and processed within one hour. Semen analysis was performed using the World Health Organization (WHO) manual (6th edition). Sperm function tests were conducted in an andrology laboratory, including Reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA fragmentation, lipid peroxidation, and Creatine Kinase (CK) analysis. An essential endocrine evaluation was performed. Patients with a history of disorders that could impair testicular function were excluded. A group of pre-vasectomy baseline samples was used as a control group. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.5. One-tailed and paired T-tests were used for comparisons between groups. RESULTS: The sample size was 26 men (mean 34.3±6.5 years;range: 21-50 years). Sperm concentration (mean 38.74±32, P <0.01) and total motile count (mean 55.3±66.8, P <0.01) were significantly reduced in the COVID-19 group. The DNA fragmentation (mean 41.1±29.2) and ROS (mean 4.84±8.7) were significantly higher in post-infection patients. Other parameters such as WHO/ Kruger morphology and progressive motility were also reduced in the disease group, albeit not statistically significant. Total testosterone (mean 409.2±201.2) was lower in the convalescent men. All semen samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2 using the PCR analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that male reproductive injury can be a relevant component of SARS-CoV-2 systemic infection. High DNA fragmentation and ROS, hallmarks of tissue injury, might signal a direct testicular involvement. The morphological and functional damage could represent significant impairment of the male reproductive health if persistent after convalescence.

18.
Fertility and Sterility ; 116(3 SUPPL):e67, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1880707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The last year has represented a challenging time for andrology laboratories due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health guidelines and government regulations intended to reduce the spread of COVID-19 caused a shift in patient practices across healthcare. They impacted the infertility laboratory by changing where and how semen samples are collected. The current study compared the quality of semen being collected for routine semen analysis (SA), and therapeutic IUI cycles, comparing the first year of the pandemic with the previous twelve-month period in a regional fertility center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional rules, public health guidelines, and government regulations required the majority (> 98%) of semen samples collected at a regional fertility center to be collected off-site starting March 18th, 2020. The center serves a catchment basin of approximately 300 miles in diameter, meaning some patients might travel for 1-2 hrs to deliver samples collected at home or have to make other arrangements for a collection location closer to the laboratory. To determine what impact the delay in processing and other factors, such as stress, might be having on semen quality, the center conducted a study comparing the standard semen parameters in two arms. The COVID-19 arm were patients seen from March 18th, 2020 to March 17th, 2021, and they were compared to the Pre-COVID-19 arm, who were seen from March 18th, 2019 to March 17th, 2020. Semen Analysis parameters analyzed for all samples included volume, concentration/mL, motility, morphology, total concentration, and total motile concentration. IUI samples were also analyzed for post-wash total concentration and total motile concentration. Resulting Data were compared using student's T-test. RESULTS: A total of 423 SA and 378 IUI records were compared. As expected, off-site collection significantly increased the time from collection to completion of the procedure (P < 0.001). Numerous semen parameters of the standard semen analysis were 10-20% lower in the pandemic year when collecting off-site than the same parameter in the 12 months before the pandemic when on-site collection was used. Focusing on IUI data, the average processing time from collection to finish increased 26 to 48 mins (p < 0.006). Average Total motile sperm has decreased from 49 to 42 million (14%;P < 0.05) between groups. Pregnancy data is pending. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has presented challenges to all reproductive centers. The challenges appear to have had a negative effect on the overall semen quality of patients. While it is unclear how much of an impact delays in processing are having, the data is highly suggestive they are impacting patient treatment. IMPACT STATEMENT: While delivery of reproductive health care continued during the pandemic, changes in public health guidelines and governmental regulations have impacted patient care thereby causing a reduction in semen quality. Public health officials and practices may need to reevaluate how semen samples are collected for diagnostics and treatment to mitigate this reduction in quality while maintaining the overall health of patients and staff.

19.
Fertility and Sterility ; 116(3 SUPPL):e220-e221, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1880691

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 in sperm cryopreservation processes, including functional parameters evaluated pre-cryopreservation and post-thaw, and to compare post-thaw results from COVID-19 patients to samples from others systemic and andrological Disease MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 37 semen samples of male patients aged 18 to 45 years at Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital das Clinicas of the University of Sao Paulo or at Androscience- Science and Innovation Center in Andrology, High-Complex Clinical and Research Andrology Laboratory, were initially recruited from April 2020 to April 2021. Patients were categorized as acute COVID-19 (n=15), confirmed by RT-PCR (COVID-19 group), and healthy individuals with normozoospermic semen samples (n=22;Control group). Were evaluated seminal parameters, cryosurvival rates (%), mitochondrial activity (%;3,30 -diaminobenzidine stain), reactive oxygen species levels (ROS;chemiluminescent technique) and DNA fragmentation (%;SCSA method) in precryopreservation and post-thaw samples. Samples were cryopreserved by the slow freezing technique. A complementary retrospective study was performed comparing post-thawed samples from COVID-19 group with data from patients with others male diseases: Male infertility (n=35);Severe infertility (n=62), caused severe oligozoospermia, grade 3 varicocele, gonadal dysgenesis, testicular nodule, testicular hypotrophy;testicular cancer (n=55);and other malignant diseases (leukemia, lymphoma, sarcoma, multiple myeloma;n=30). Was used T-test to statistical analysis (p<0.05). RESULTS: Macroscopy analysis of COVID-group revealed abnormal viscosity in 53.33%, semen volume = 4.50 ± 1.72 ml and pH = 8.13 ± 0.23. COVID-19 fresh samples demonstrated mean of progressive motility = 29.07±16.83%, sperm morphology = 2.07±1.58%, and DNA fragmentation index = 42.91±33.38%. Cryopreservation decreased progressive motility (to 5.39±7.92%;p=0.02), sperm vitality (70.46±8.50 vs. 72.20±23.27;p=0.042) and ROS (0.516±0.978 vs. 4.393±9.956 x 104 cpm;p=0.018). When we compared with cryopreserved normozoospermic samples, there was observed a significant difference in HDS (p=0.002). Cryosurvival rate from COVID-19 samples was 19.93;19.71%, and had significant difference when compared with severe infertility (40.16;31.05%;p=0.003), and other malignant diseases (53.14;28.55%, <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Seminal samples from patients with COVID-19 showed reduced fertile potential, especially when compared to the reference values. In the comparisons performed with samples from patients with different andrological diagnoses, common in the specialized andrology laboratory routine, we can suggest that samples from patients with the acute form of COVID-19 had the worst quality, with low cryosurvival rates. This information contribute to the conduct of these patients during assisted reproduction routines and preservation of male fertility. IMPACT STATEMENT: It will contribute to conducts in the cryopreservation of sperm in patients with acute COVID-19.

20.
Fertility and Sterility ; 116(3 SUPPL):e296, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1880440

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-COV-2) enter different body tissues via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. This enzyme is highly expressed in testicular tissue making testicular hormone function & spermatogenesis vulnerable to such infection. This study aims to evaluate the effect of SARS COV-2 infection on the testicular function in proven fertile males on short & long term basis MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients infected with SARS COV-2 virus. Patients with normal semen analysis or evidence of fertility in the past 2 years were included. Patients with history of infertility or those receiving treatment & had abnormal semen parameters prior to infection were excluded. Patients were divided into asymptomatic & symptomatic group requiring hospitalization. Medical history & physical exam were performed during the initial visit and blood hormones were withdrawn. Patients underwent conventional semen analysis, advanced sperm function tests & hormone tests at 3 & 6 months following infection. Variables were reported as mean ± SE & compared using Kruskal Wallis Test. Spearman correlation was performed to assess relationship between Ct PCR value & numerical variables RESULTS: A total of 60 patients infected with SARS COV-2 virus were included & 48 patients completed the study. The mean age was 35.1±5.6 years. The mean Ct value was 23.38±5.2. There was no significant correlation between the Ct value, the hormonal profile & patient age at time of recruitment. The semen parameters & hormonal profile at 3 & 6 months follow up were in normal range (Table 1). There was significant difference in the testosterone levels between asymptomatic group (mean 11.35 ± 4.8) & symptomatic hospitalized group (mean 7.48 ± 3.49) upon initial enrollment (P value=0.005). Decreased testosterone levels during infection turned back to normal on 6 months follow up (mean 12.78±4.98) CONCLUSIONS: SARS COV-2 infection does not affect semen parameters nor hormonal profile for previously fertile patients on short & long term basis. Testosterone levels in symptomatic hospitalized patients is significantly decreased compared to asymptomatic non-hospitalized group at the time of SARS COV-2 infection IMPACT STATEMENT: Long term reproductive health of men is not affected by SARS COV-2 infection. (Table Presented).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL